We equip places where people spend their days and where water arrives by truck. The system is the same. What changes is the demand profile, the constraints of the site, and who operates it day to day.
The common thread: no network connection, a resident or daily population, and an existing supply that depends on someone driving water to the site.
Boarding schools, Dar Taliba, rural schools. Steady demand, a known headcount and a team on site all year: the most favourable profile we work with.
Discuss a school site →Isolated clinics and health centres, where the availability and quality of water directly condition what the facility can do.
Discuss a health site →Remote operations and worker accommodation far from any network, where drinking water is currently a logistics line item.
Discuss an industrial site →Lodges, camps and remote guest facilities. Seasonal demand, heavy logistics constraints, and guests who expect safe water.
Discuss a hospitality site →Community buildings and gathering points in enclaved areas, where a network extension is not on any near-term plan.
Discuss a community site →Situations where installing a network is not an option and where the deciding factor is how fast water becomes available.
Discuss a temporary site →Two inputs settle the order of magnitude: how many people are on site, and what the water is for. Everything else — solar exposure, local humidity, seasonality, available footprint — is settled during the site study.
WHO puts survival needs — drinking and food preparation — at 2.5 to 3 litres per person per day.
Capacity is not added one small machine at a time. Above 250 litres a day we move to a modular class delivering 1 000 litres per unit, and above 5 000 to a container-scale class. A site needing 3 000 litres a day is served by three units, not twelve. Fewer units means fewer things to maintain, and a lower cost per cubic metre.
On a site with no network connection, the honest comparison is not the public tariff. It is what the site pays today: trucked water, bottled water, or the cost of doing without.
Against that baseline, produced water sits well below bottled water and well above a network connection. Where exactly depends on the site, and on how the installation is financed.
Relative cost per cubic metre, indexed on bottled water. Trucked water is excluded: its cost varies too widely with distance to be plotted honestly. Only Amanow and bottled water are available where there is no network.
The capital cost of the installation, spread over its service life. Maintenance and quality control. And the site's own climate, which decides how many litres each kilowatt-hour yields.
Grant or concessional financing on the capital cost. Several sites operated as one fleet. And a favourable climate, which is exactly what the eligibility map measures. See the map
Per site, after the study, in the currency you work in: dirhams, euros or dollars. The technical brief sets out the assumptions behind every figure, so they can be checked rather than believed.
Request the briefLocation, headcount, and how water reaches the site today.
Send us those three →